![]() ![]() The new MacBook Pros-released, for the record, a year and a half after the 2015 models, which were in some cases changed very little from the 20 models-have been birthed into this era of frustration. Macs aren't even regularly refreshed with new processors from Intel, Nvidia, and AMD as they're released anymore we could rely on that as recently as three years ago. The iPhone gets refreshed promptly and consistently every September, while some Macs sit there for one or two or three years without even being mentioned. In the space of just a decade, they've watched their favorite platform go from being the center of the company's attention to a minor line item. We will post full-length reviews of the new MacBook Pros in due course.You can't fault longtime die-hard Mac users for being a little frustrated with Apple. That way you have a powerful machine that's not reliant on adapters, though its years-old form factor and last-gen display could make it look a little aged.įor a more in-depth look, read New Atlas' review of the MacBook Air or first impressions of the non-Touch Bar MacBook Pro. Still, for maximum forward and backward utility, it's tempting to get a custom-configured Air with a speedy processor. It has a far superior display and graphics, and for an additional $300, it's got the fancy new Touch Bar as well. On the other hand, it's always tempting to opt for the latest and greatest, which in this case would be the year-and-a-half newer MacBook Pro. Using this year's MacBook Pro, especially for professional applications, is likely to demand the use of adapters and other peripherals. The Air has a few things the MacBook Pro doesn't, namely traditional ports. That's a significant amount, so it complicates this decision. ![]() The base model Air starts out US$500 cheaper than the Pro. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |